Provider portfolio

Google Gemini models: Pro and Flash records compared

This portfolio view separates a reasoning-oriented Pro record from two later Flash records built around faster production and agent workflows. It preserves unavailable pricing and benchmark fields rather than treating the shared Gemini name as evidence of equal settings or capability.

Selection guide

Which Google model fits the workload?

Use the Pro record as a reasoning and multimodal evaluation candidate. Use the stable Flash records for speed-oriented agent and coding workloads, then verify the exact API model, quota, modality, and current price in Google’s documentation.

API + app

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Consider for: Multimodal reasoning over large codebases, documents, video, and audio where a Pro-tier evaluation is appropriate.

Account for: Older release record with workload-dependent tiered pricing.

API

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Consider for: Stable sustained agent and coding workloads where the exact deployed model is already required.

Account for: Canonical numeric pricing is unavailable in the directory and computer use remains preview functionality.

API + app

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Consider for: Current stable Flash API and app workflows needing million-token multimodal input and lower listed prices than many frontier models.

Account for: Closed weights, undisclosed parameters, and a 65,536-token output limit.

Google model specifications and prices

ModelAccessReleasedContextInput / 1MOutput / 1M
Gemini 2.5 ProAPI + appMarch 25, 20251.0M$1.25$10.00
Gemini 3.5 FlashAPIJune 24, 20261.0MUnavailableUnavailable
Gemini 3.6 FlashAPI + appJuly 21, 20261.0M$1.50$7.50

Prices are provider-listed USD snapshots per million tokens where represented. Caching, batch processing, long-context rules, modalities, regions, and service tiers can change effective cost.

Reported benchmark coverage

ModelMMLU-ProGPQA DiamondSWE-bench VerifiedLiveCodeBench
Gemini 2.5 Pro86.28463.848.1
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.6 Flash

A dash means the exact evaluation was not retained for that model. Unlike benchmark families and source settings are not merged into an overall score.

Comparability limit: Gemini 2.5 Pro has retained benchmark results and an older reviewed price snapshot. Gemini 3.5 Flash has no canonical numeric price in this directory, while Gemini 3.6 Flash has a newer listed text-token price. These differences must not be filled by inference.

Provider and model sources

Each model keeps its own source record and limitations. Review the provider API reference for current authentication, quotas, SDK status, and pricing rules before implementation.